The Code Man

A Closer Look at Air Barriers:

What You Should Know About Air Barriers for Metal Buildings

July 1, 2016

Air Barriers
Air barriers have been used in many different ways throughout the years, and they're becoming particularly relevant as energy code requirements evolve. But what makes them different from, say, a vapor barrier? How do they fit in with code compliance, and why should you care? These are questions I aim to answer in this blog post, so keep reading.


What Does an Air Barrier Do?

The purpose of an air barrier is to limit uncontrolled air leakage into and out of the building’s envelope. A building’s envelope is defined as roof, wall, and floor area that encloses a heated or cooled area. Uncontrolled leakage will result in increased energy usage due to the heat or cooling lost. In the 1930s, the University of Minnesota did a study on leakage through framed walls, resulting in the first acceptance and use of paper weather barriers. Unfortunately, over the next 7 decades, the concept and proper use was lacking in building science and training for contractors, resulting in many building failures. In the 1970s, however, an oil embargo led to the construction industry becoming more focused on adding insulation and vapor barriers in order to conserve energy.


Basics of Air Leakage

Air leakage is sometimes called infiltration, which is the unintentional or accidental introduction of outside air. Humid climates will have warm, moist air moving into the building envelope through leakage and door passage. In the winter months, this can result in moist indoor air moving into the envelope cavities, which can lead to condensation that may damage the insulation and further impact the performance of the building envelope. Infiltration is caused by wind, stack effect, and mechanical equipment.

Wind creates positive pressure on the windward side, and negative pressure on the leeward side, which can lead to infiltration. Stack effect refers to warm air rising in the winter and leaking at the roof/ceiling area, as well as cold-air infiltration at the lower areas of the building—namely, around passage doors, overhead doors, and windows. Mechanical equipment moves air within the building, which can generate positive and negative pressure differences if the air is not properly exchanged.

In 2016, air barriers are part of the ASHRAE 90.1, ASHRAE 189.1, and International Energy Conservation Code (IECC). The ASHRAE 90.1-2010 Standard was the first to mention and include the air barrier requirement. The IECC 2012 code, developed afterwards, was also instrumental in creating a requirement with specific details on identifying, joining, and sealing air barriers. IECC 2012 requires conditioned space to have an air barrier and ASHRAE 90.1-2010 requires non-residential space to have an air barrier. There are some exemptions within the ASHRAE 90.1-2010 climate zones 1-3. However, each state in these climate zones may enforce the air barrier standard regardless of the exemption. Both require all seams, penetrations, and transitions between approved materials or assemblies to be sealed. In addition, IECC requires all joints and seals be securely installed in or on the joint for its entire length so as not to dislodge, loosen, or otherwise impact its ability to resist positive and negative pressure from wind, stack effect, and mechanical systems.

All of the aforementioned requirements of the ASHRAE 90.1-2010 and IECC 2012 must be met, but building designers have some options on how to comply with these requirements. The building designer will make the choice as to which route he or she will take for compliance. There are 3 ways to comply with the Air Barrier Standard:

  1. Assembly
  2. Whole Building
  3. Materials


Assembly Compliance Option

The assembly option is one of the more involved routes to take, and, depending on the type of construction, can be difficult to obtain. Metal buildings may offer an easier road to compliance in the assembly option due to the simplified construction of these buildings. Metal building roof and wall design is fairly standardized and has remained unchanged for many years. The Metal Building Manufacturers Association (MBMA) worked with the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) to conduct a series of air infiltration tests to evaluate the air-sealing effectiveness of various metal building wall insulation systems. The recorded results were well within the required leakage levels. Conventional-type buildings may be a little more difficult because of the varying types of wall and roof assemblies.


Whole-Building Compliance Option

Attempting to meet the air barrier standard using the whole building can be difficult, and should be approached cautiously on any type of project. When the designer uses this option, the building will be blower-door tested to see if the allowable leakage rate is met. If a building fails this test, it is then the general contractor’s responsibility to make corrective measures to seal the failed areas, which can be extremely costly. If using the whole-building option, it is advisable to use an air barrier consultant. After choosing the whole-building option, a designer cannot go back and use the materials or assembly option, so this approach must be utilized with extreme attention and care.


Materials Compliance Option

The materials option refers to meeting the code through the use of insulation materials. In the construction of metal buildings, the vapor barrier is used as the air barrier, and all vapor barriers have been tested to ensure they will meet the materials option.

IECC and ASHRAE both have a list of materials that can be used as the air barrier. However, the work does not end at merely selecting a material—the proper joining of the materials is necessary, and requires careful attention in the field. In addition to the list within these codes and standards, any material tested with an air permeance < 0.004 cfm/ft2 under a pressure differential of 0.3in w.g.—also known as ASTM E2178—can also be used as the air barrier. This process can be a little complex, as some air barrier material suppliers have recommended procedures for joining their products, while others do not. There is also a lack of training and a deficit of instructions for these products in the field. Similar to the other approaches, metal buildings may offer an easier path due to their simple, standardized construction. In conventional construction however, the designer is in the position of tying together many different types of construction and air barrier materials within different types of construction. In this circumstance, it is always advisable to hire an air barrier consultant. They can look at all the types of construction and air barrier materials, and detail the joining of these areas. All plans must be minutely detailed on the drawings, or they will not be built properly.

All fenestrations of a building envelope also have requirements for air leakage. See Figure 1 below for the test procedures and allowable leakage.


Fenestration Testing and Leakage Rates

Figure 1: Fenestration Testing and Leakage Rates


Metal buildings are estimated to make up around 40% of all low-rise commercial construction and have a simple basic design that allows many options for code compliance. In August 2015 we did some testing of a metal building in Maine, with remarkable results.

Figure 2 depicts a metal building undergoing testing and Figure 3 shows the test results. During the same time period, we also tested other metal buildings and found that meeting the 0.4 leakage can be difficult.

Building Air Test

Figure 2: Metal building undergoing air barrier compliance testing


Building Test Results

Figure 3: Results of air infiltration testing


As the future of code cycles change, the air barrier requirement will only increase in terms of required performance. The location of the air barrier is important and may vary depending on the type of construction. There are 3 basic options for the location of the air barrier in metal buildings: First is the interior of the envelope (vapor barrier), second is the exterior of the envelope (metal siding), and third is somewhere in the assembly. We focused our testing and construction on the third option, since the life span of the air barrier is longer and is less likely to fail—as shown in the strong test results above, it offers many advantages. The first interior option has many vulnerabilities based on its exposure to other trades, and damages from day-to-day operations from occupants. The second exterior option is vulnerable to damage from movement, as any air-sealed exterior product is at risk of failing over time as the building moves. It is important to take leakage and the in-place U-Value of the envelope into consideration when designing a building’s mechanical systems. Oftentimes in construction, there is no communication between those responsible for envelope design and those responsible for mechanical systems. This needs to change in order to yield the best final results: a building that uses less energy and operates at maximum efficiency.


Last, but Certainly Not Least…

Meeting the air barrier requirements for the energy codes has been confusing and, in most cases, ignored. An airtight envelope is an energy efficient envelope. That is why we’re pleased to announce the arrival of our own air barrier system. I’ll write a blog post when our system launches. Until then, fill out this form if you have any questions pertaining to the air barrier information presented in today’s post.

Want to make sure you don’t miss out on the latest energy code updates? Subscribe to our energy code newsletter to get blog posts sent directly to your inbox.

Subscribe now